THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD
Suppose you are upstairs in your
house when you hear a crash and clanging sound from downstairs. You run downstairs and see your little
brother crying on the floor next to an overturned chair and two pans. The cupboard door above him where the pots,
pans, and leftover Halloween candy is kept, is wide open.
The details in the paragraph above
describe your observations. For example, you heard a crash, you observed the
overturned chair, and you actually saw your brother on the floor crying.
You can reasonably conclude that
your little brother got up onto a chair to get some candy, and that he fell,
knocking some pans out of the cupboard and the chair over. These are your
inferences.
Although you did not actually
observe your brother fall off the chair, the position of the chair and your
brother on the floor leads you to think that he did fall. And although you didn't know that your
brother wanted the candy, the open cupboard door, and the pans from the same
cupboard where the candy is kept lead you to think that he did. Scientists make inferences from their
observations in much the same way.
Scientifically minded people
generally believe in cause-and-effect relationships. They feel there is a
perfectly natural explanation for most things. For example, there is a reason
why milk sours and why some leaves turn red in the fall, while others turn
yellow. Changes such as these, which are easily observed, are known as
phenomena. Some common phenomena are not completely understood. Still others cannot
be explained at all at this time. The belief that effects have causes plays a
significant part in the scientific method. The cause of AIDS, for example, was
once unknown. Nevertheless, scientists firmly believed that a cause existed.
Once they discovered that it was caused by a virus, scientists could search for
a remedy. If everyone believed that a disease just happened without a natural
cause, no progress would be made in learning to control it.
Scientists spend tremendous amounts
of time making observations and gathering information, or data. They work using
the scientific
method. Overall, the scientific method involves four basic steps. There
are variations in some scientific methods which may breakdown one or more of
these steps into more detailed steps. The four basic steps involve OBSERVATION, HYPOTHESIS, EXPERIMENT, and
CONCLUSION.
OBSERVATION
The observation step begins with a problem. Scientists can become
interested in a particular problem from reading about it or simply by observing
something in nature. They ask questions that begin with “Why does…?”, “How
does…?”, or “What determines…?” When the term “observation” is used, concerning the scientific method, it is
defined as the process of using any of your five senses to gain information
about your environment or about a problem. As soon as the observations are
made, inferences are then made. An inference
is defined as drawing conclusions on the basis of facts. In other words, an
inference is essentially a guess based on facts or observations that were made.
Once the problem is firmly grasped, the scientist tries to learn as much as
possible about it. Frequently this involves studying books and journals that
contain information about the problem. This is called searching the literature.
HYPOTHESIS
Once the problem has been
identified, observations have been made, and research has been completed to
learn of the problem, the scientist then moves to the second overall step,
HYPOTHESIS.
A hypothesis is defined many ways.
Some describe it as an educated guess or a testable statement. A hypothesis can best be defined as a
possible explanation of some event or idea that can be tested or experimented.
A hypothesis is a statement, not a question, that may be a correct explanation
of some event or idea, or it may not. Performing the third step of the
scientific method, conducting an experiment, will prove the hypothesis correct
or incorrect.
EXPERIMENT
After a hypothesis is created the
scientist then designs an experiment to test and see if their educated guess or
testable statement is correct. An experiment can be defined as a
procedure that is designed and carried out under controlled conditions to prove
or disprove a hypothesis. Keep in mind that most controlled experiments are
performed in laboratories, and that not all experiments are controlled. When a biologist is doing field work, the
experiment cannot be completely controlled. There are many scientific questions
that are not able to be tested by scientific methods. Just because they are not able to be answered
does not mean that these questions are unimportant. Some questions just cannot be tested
scientifically in a controlled experiment that would yield valid data.
An experiment will
consists of a control group, experimental group, constants, dependent variable
and independent variable. The control
group is used as a standard of comparison in which everything is kept as
natural or normal as possible. The experimental
group is constant or consistent with the control group except that one item
is changed within it. Constants are all of the items that
remain the same among the control and experimental groups. The independent variable, which is also
described as the manipulated variable or testing variable, is the one item that
is changed between the two groups. The independent variable is found in the
experimental group but not the control group. The dependent variable is the responding variable which is measured. The experiment gives
the scientist measurements and observations, referred to as data, which can be
described as qualitative or quantitative. Quantitative
data is defined as data recorded as numbers.
This type of data often is used to make graphs and tables that communicate
large amounts of information in an easy to understand format. Qualitative data
is data recorded as descriptions or words. An example of qualitative
research could be comparing the attitudes of people who live in cloudy regions
with people who live in a sunnier climate.
CONCLUSION
The experiment gives the scientist
measurements and observations, which are then analyzed. Analyzing the data
brings you to the final step of the scientific
method which is conclusion. Conclusion
is defined as a statement that tells if the data supports the hypothesis or
not. After the data is analyzed, a conclusion can be made as to whether the
hypothesis was correct or incorrect. If the hypothesis was incorrect based on
the data, the scientist can return back to step two, revise the hypothesis, and
test it again. If the hypothesis was correct, scientists in other
laboratories repeat the experiment to make sure that they get the same results.
Scientific results must be repeatable. This means that scientists must get the
same results every time they do the same experiment. If the results of the
other scientists' tests are the same, the scientific community will accept the
hypothesis. The hypothesis then becomes a theory—an explanation for why something
happens. Theories can be revised if scientists discover new information about
the subject.
The
Five Steps of the Scientific Method (04:42)
SCIENTIFIC METHOD EXAMPLE
Example scenario:
An experiment was
designed to investigate the effect of caffeine on the heartbeat of water
fleas. Two populations of water fleas
were cultured. Both populations had
water with the same mineral content,
were supplied with identical amounts of
bacteria as food, received the same
amount of light, and had their
temperature maintained at 20 degrees Celsius. Every two hours, water fleas from both
populations were selected and their heartbeats
were monitored. The fleas from population one, however, had caffeine administered 5 minutes before
the heartbeat was checked while population
two was given nothing.
Questions about the “Experiment Details” for the
above example |
Answers |
What is the Control Group? |
Population 2 |
(Group kept as the standard or normal situation.) |
|
What is the Experimental Group? |
Population 1 |
(Group that has one item different from the control
group.) |
|
What is the Independent Variable? |
Caffeine |
(The item that is added to the experimental group
but not to the control group.) |
|
What is the Dependent Variable? |
Heartbeat of the water fleas |
(The responding, or measuring, item or variable.) |
|
What are the Constants? |
Food, water temperature, mineral content, and light |
(All items that are kept the same between the
control and experimental groups.) |
International
System of Measurement (SI system)
Biologists
all over the world use the International
System of Measurement (SI system) to report quantitative information about
their experiments. This SI system has an
advantage over using the English system that most of us in the United States
use. One advantage is that, it is like
the metric system, a decimal system with measurements is found in multiples of
tens or tenths of a basic unit by using a set of prefixes. Therefore, it is easier to convert from one
measurement to another.
The following video briefly examines the disparity
between the U.S. customary and metric systems, explaining who uses the metric
system and why and teaching the value of knowing how to convert between the
two. This program demonstrates two methods of unit conversions, the unit
cancellation and moving decimal formulas. Practice conversion problems
reinforce these new strategies while introducing two new metric unit
measurements, fluid volume in liters and mass in grams.
Measurement: The Metric System
Now answer questions 1 through 25.